franzmannzini hat geschrieben:(07 Oct 2020, 14:03)
Deine erste und Deine zweite Quelle sind identisch:
Und Dein Satz "Der Unsinn, den Dr. Suzanne Humphries verzapft, ist doch schon seit Jahren eindeutig widerlegt!" ist ein Plagiat
eines Kommentars von dieser Seite:
https://www.aerzteblatt.de/studieren/forum/127278
wo ein Herr Dr. med. Thomas G. Schätzler auf den Link der Plattform Medium verweist.
Das heißt der Herr Dr. widerlegt nicht selbst, sondern verweist auf einen Beitrag der Userin Isabella B.
Tschuldige ich dachte die Quelle wurde übernommen korrekt inkl paste.
This is a longer version of my post on Friday, November 9th, 2018. It is a lengthy discussion of why Suzanne Humphries, MD and Roman Bystrianyk’s book Dissolving Illusions misrepresents the dangers of polio, one in a series of posts that should comprehensively show the problems with their claims. It covers far more than just polio, but is worthwhile for those interested in the details.
Joel A. Harrison on November 10, 2018
https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/wrong- ... g-version/
Joel A. Harrison, PhD, MPH is a retired epidemiologist who has been writing articles over the past years supporting vaccinations for Every Child By Two, an excellent non-profit founded in 1991. Every Child By Two has changed to Vaccinate Your Family, expanding its mission to include vaccines for people of all ages.
https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/author ... -harrison/
Suzanne Humphries is a nephrologist turned vocal proponent of pseudoscience, woo, and worse. She has been involved with the International Medical Council on Vaccination, a front group for anti-vaccinationism, and has written several blog posts and done several podcasts and interviews (e.g. for NaturalNews) insinuating that kidney failure is caused by vaccines. The fact that she is a medical doctor does not mean that she know how science or evidence works, however, and – as expected – her evidence is purely anecdotal; in fact, her reasoning is entirely based on “feeling” the vaccines’s role in kidney disease, which just goes to display in full her complete lack of training in, expertise or understanding of any relevant field of immunology. You see, not only are vaccines unnatural, they are “disease matter”, which, I suppose, is a compelling point for anyone who swears by the laws of medieval alchemy.
Humphreys has also asserted her adoption of homeopathy, after extensive studies. She does not even try to link homeopathy to reality, instead adopting fullblown vitalism, claiming that homeopathy works by fixing energy flows in the body. In fact, she claims that homeopathy is a “more advanced system” than evidence-based modern medicine, and that the latter tends to exacerbate the forces that drive chronic illness. Therefore, according to Humphries, people should limit their medical care only to homeopaths, chiropractors, and osteopaths. And of course, modern doctors are deliberately suppressing effective alternative cures because they are all in on a conspiracy funded by Big Pharma. (Yes, that post was published on the pile of quackery website Medical Voices.)
To top it off, she attempts to combine her anti-vax claims and pseudobullshit with religious fluffery to argue that the Bible and Koran are opposed to vaccination. That’s the level she’s pitched at.
https://americanloons.blogspot.com/2013 ... s.html?m=1
Ich habe es bereits erwähnt. Sie ist widerlegt.
Nur eine von diversen Quellen. Das falsche Verlinken war inklusive Rest Paste nicht richtig übernommen. Die jetzige Quelle geht ins Detail und erklärt stringent warum die Frau Doktor falsch liegt.
Slapstick pur.
liegt aber daran, dass soziodemographische Daten meist am Anfang des Fragebogens platziert werden, um zu verhindern, dass man Daten von jenen die den Fragebogen nicht vollständig ausfüllen trotzdem verwenden kann 
